The Commerce Secretary nominee Howard Lutnick, who testified before the U.S. Senate on Tuesday, asserted that DeepSeek cheated when its innovative new AI type attacked leading western AI firms this year.

” They stole issues, they broke in, they’ve taken our IP”, Lutnick said, reflecting broader U. S. state concerns about Chinese firms probably misappropriating&nbsp, U. S. systems.

On Wednesday, the White House and DeepSeek teamed up to assess potential threats to national security posed by its AI. Critics, including American businesses, accuse the Taiwanese upstart of rule-breaking, spy, and market manipulation.

After a horrible day in tech stocks, it got off to a late Monday night when OpenAI claimed DeepSeek had “distillated” (using a large model as an example to link the answers provided by smaller versions ) to extract information from its versions, which was in violation of their terms of service.

David Sacks, Donald Trump’s AI director, piled in, adding that there was” large information” of DeepSeek” sucking information” out of OpenAI’s systems.

The ChatGPT creator stated that the problem is being looked into.

An OpenAI director told ,” We are aware of and reviewing evidence that DeepSeek perhaps had improperly distilled our types.”

The pushback came in response to DeepSeek’s impact on Nvidia’s market cap, erasing close to$ 600 billion —a record wipeout—on Monday after launching a new kind of AI model last week that supposedly matches U. S. capabilities at a mere fraction of the cost.

Bill Ackman, a hedge fund manager who joked that Trump and God were the members of DeepSeek and that they might have created a completely Nvidia stock market. After all, DeepSeek is supported by a quantitative hedge fund.

” What are the odds that DeepSeek AI’s hedge fund affiliates made a fortune yesterday with short-dated sets on Nvidia, energy companies, etc.? A wealth could have been made”, Ackman tweeted.

Though President Donald Trump first called DeepSeek’s type a “wake-up contact” for the business and a “positive thing”, the U. S. Navy has already reached a different assumption.

The defense unit issued a directive to personnel to avoid using DeepSeek’s engineering “in any capacity,” according to CNBC, citing “potential security and ethical concerns related to the woman’s origin and usage.”

In an internet to the soldiers Friday, the Navy said it’s” important” for any staff member to prevent DeepSeek” for any work-related tasks or private use.”

However, across the Atlantic, European regulators are even taking a hard look at DeepSeek.

Despite the fact that all of those answers are made publicly available in DeepSeek AI’s Protection Plan, the country’s Data Protection Authority gave DeepSeek 20 days to discuss exactly what private data they collect, store, and use.

For its part, DeepSeek has so far remained silent and has not responded to ( or anyone else ) for comment.

” Karma’s a Bitch.”

Artificial intelligence is not necessary to predict the Internet’s swift and cruel response to everything:

” OpenAI is unhappy that DeepSeek trained on their data without consent or compensation,” tweeted Toby Walsh, Chief Scientist at the University of New South Wales’s AI Institute”. Oh, the irony for all of us authors who are dissatisfied with OpenAI for their data-related training without getting paid or given any compensation! “he posted on X.

” DeepSeek may have broken OpenAI’s Terms of Service and distilled their intellectual property without getting permission.” OpenAI may well have done analogous things to YouTube, New York Times, and countless artists and writers,” AI researcher and writer Gary Marcus tweeted”. Karma is a bitch.”

And Edward Zitron, a critic of the tech industry, claimed that the controversy exhibited deeper issues in American technology in a protracted rant on his blog.

He argued it revealed fundamental problems with U. S. tech companies”. This isn’t about China— it’s so much fucking easier if we let it be about China,” Zitron fulminated”. It’s about how the American tech industry is incurious, lazy, entitled, directionless and irresponsible.”

Far more at ease was Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas, who had already adapted and integrated DeepSeek into his search engine.

Srinivas defended DeepSeek in terms of technical support against claims that it had influenced OpenAI. There’s a lot of misconception that China ‘ just cloned’ the outputs of OpenAi, “he tweeted”. This is far from accurate, and it reflects a lack of knowledge of how these models were initially trained.

” DeepSeek R1 has figured out ( Reinforcement Learning ) fine-tuning… Instead of imitating other people or models, it is primarily because it learned reasoning from scratch.

In other words, DeepSeek did the work.

Indeed, Zitron pointed to OpenAI and Anthropic as examples of what he called” the antithesis of Silicon Valley” and pointed out that he was more concerned with marketing than innovation, clearly unconcerned by the claims that DeepSeek made a dishonest move.

His conclusion? The desire to portray DeepSeek as a Chinese threat conveniently masks a more troubling truth: U.S. tech companies no longer have the desire to develop meaningful solutions.

” Personally, I genuinely want OpenAI to point a finger at DeepSeek and accuse it of IP theft, purely for the hypocrisy factor”, Zitron said. This business is run solely off of the gross industrial larceny of content produced by individual creators and internet users, and it is concerned about a rival stealing its own goods. Cry more, Altman, you nasty little worm”.

edited by Sebastian Sinclair and Josh Quittner

Generally Intelligent Newsletter

A generative AI model’s generative AI model, Gen, tells a weekly AI journey.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!