In a nutshell
- Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity AI, claims that removing Chrome would harm consumers and ignore the true problem: Android’s stringent defaults.
- After winning its seek monopoly event, the DOJ is now pursuing structural reforms, possibly forbidding Facebook to market Chrome.
- A second federal judge recently upheld Google’s illegal monopoly of online ads, adding to the pressure placed on the courts.
In response to confusion, confusion has urged a Washington judge to dismiss the DOJ’s antitrust situation against Google and rather advocate for measures that prioritize consumer choice.
Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas tweeted on Monday, backlashing the Department of Justice’s proposal to push Google to offer its Chrome browser, saying,” We don’t believe anyone else can run a computer at that level without a beat on value.”  ,
Following Judge Amit Mehta’s decision last year that Google had unjustly maintained its hegemony through exclusive contracts with Apple, Samsung, and others, Srinivas confirmed that Perplexity had been asked to testify in the DOJ’s remedies period of one of the most important software dominance cases in over two decades.  ,
The DOJ is currently pursuing structural changes, including the elimination of the Google Chrome browser, restrictions on the sale of AI products, and a restrictions on exclusive use of proxy software agreements.
According to DOJ attorney David Dahlquist,” now is the time to warn Google and all other plutocrats that any violation of monopolistic laws will result in consequences.”
However, Perplexity’s position is that the main problem isn’t the stringent environment surrounding Android and Google’s suite of apps. It’s not Chrome’s market share.  ,
The Perplexity group claimed in a companion website blog that OEMs and companies are pressured into preloading Google applications, which limits their ability to offer competing companies.  ,
According to Srinivas, phone companies may employ a Google-approved version of Android if they want to access important apps like YouTube, Maps, and the Play Store. The approval depends on setting Google Assistant and Search as failures.  ,
Even minor adjustments, according to the business, could lead to lower income shares or restricted access to important apps like the Play Store.
The solution, according to Srinivas, is giving customers the option to choose their defaults without running the risk of losing money.
The remedies cycle comes at a time when Google is increasingly subject to increased legal attention on a number of fronts.  ,
A federal prosecutor in Virginia ruled that the firm had even broken antitrust rules in the online advertising market just days before the most recent hearings began.  ,
A U.S. judge has determined that Google used its dominance in ad technology to increase profits and reduce rivals for the second period in less than a year.
edited by Sebastian Sinclair
Generally Intelligent Newsletter
A conceptual AI model’s relational AI model, Gen, tells a regular AI journey.
